Early African Arab relations Ibn Battuta in black Africa - The peaceful beauty of African culture
Author: Amy Johns / Category: history of beauty
“Memory of the slave Trade Impact on Africa” By Louise Marie Diop-Maes
When the word Arabic is used in the bellow excerpt it should actually be replaced with Berber/Moroccan
“The great Arab traveler of the fourteenth century, Ibn Battuta, praised security and justice found in the empire of Mali. Before the use of firearms, Arabic trafficking remained marginal compared to economic activity and volume of the population…”
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/2007/11/DIOP_MAES/15329&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=7&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3DThe%2Btruth%2Babout%2Bwhat%2Bslavery%2Bdid%2Bto%2BAfrica%2Bby%2BLouise%2BMarie%2BDiop-Maes%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DG
The article bellow is talking about the slave trade in East Africa, Songhay was invaded by Morocco
“Myths about the Arab slave trade”
common myths corrected:
*Islam is not an Arab cultural invention but a religion born in a multi-racial Arabia; it was actually perceived as “foreign” by most Arab “tribes.” Islam in Africa is just as old as Islam in Arabia. Islam actually flourishes today because of the legal protection the king of Ethiopia gave it. The ideogical foundation of the 3 Abrahamic faiths is African in origin. It is a denial of African history and agency to deny the significance of Africa in the history and formation of the Islamic faith. It is ony an enslaved mind that rejects its own historical claims allowing others full credit. Later Arab and Turkish dominance lessened this history but it is an African history.
*Arab is not a racial term, to say Arab is almost like saying American: thus, people classified as Arab today, could have been Caucasian (white people), Jewish, Asiatic or even Arabized Africans.
*There was no Arab invasion or destruction of African Egypt, Kemet was concluded centuries before by Persians, then Greeks and then Roman invaders. The 1075 conquest of Ancient Ghana by the Almoravids was done by African Berbers. The sacking of Timbuktu by Morisco mercenaries armed with European-style guns in the service of the Moroccan sultan in 1591.
*There is a low African Diaspora in the Arab lands due to the proliferation of miscegenation, the dynamics of being classified as an Arab, and the degree or easy of Arabization.
*Islam did not bring the Arab slave trade. However, it did respond to it with laws of manumission. These laws were later generally ignored and misinterpretation thus protecting the privilege slaving brought.
*Arabs enslaving Africans would not be interested Proselytism as this would grant the enslaved Africans privileges. Thus slaving and the spread of Islam where in direct conflict and slavers played an opposing role in the Islamization of people (Murray Gordon, “Slavery in the Arab World.”)
*Muslim and Arab is not the same thing.
*Turks are not Arabs, Persians are not Arabs. Berbers are not Arabs, hence the Trans-Saharan or the Ottoman trade is not an Arab Slave Trade.
*Arab slaving was not the oldest slave trade in the world (see India and China). It however, was older than the Atlantic Slave trade, but it was scattered and a low priority until the 18th century.
*After the 18th century, the horrors of procuring Africans, was the most inhuman aspect of the trade, with castrations, transportation and violent slave raids being the main sources of mortality.
*The Arab slave trade in the 18th century was economically tied to the European trade. The Portuguese profited directly and were responsible for the boom in the Arab trade.
*The Arabs did not see all Africans as being of a unified “Black” race.
*Arab enslavement did not only target Africans.
*Arab slavery was primarily domestic, and only in the 18th century was it a mainstay for Arab economies.
*Arab Slavery did not leave the social legacy that the European trade continues to leave: prisons, poor education, mental health, etc.
*The Arab slave trade had a negligible impact on most Africans in the Diaspora today.
*Zanj does not mean all Africans. This is a umptive linguistic superimposition.
*Muslim Africans (and Christians) were not the main suppliers of captives for the Americas. Dahomeny and the Asante kingdom were the main suppliers.
*Many African Muslims Kingdoms were the main aggressors to European advances on the continent. Umar Taal, Malick Sy, Ahmadou Bamba, Samory Toure, etc.”
http://www.africanholocaust.net/news_ah/arabslavetrade.htm#MYTHS
Duration : 0:10:32
Tags: Africa, Arab, arts, books, communications, gold, History, humanities, inteleculism, islam, math, medicine, salt, science, sultan
25 Responses to “Early African Arab relations Ibn Battuta in black Africa - The peaceful beauty of African culture”
May 26th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
What African is in …
What African is in ARABIA killing arabs?
Like AFRICAN NEED this dumb sht man!
Africans dont need some deperate ARAB willing to kill AFRICANS just so he can sell oil to the CHINEES and the EUROPEAN!
Thats some sellout sht!
BLACK AFRICAN women are fighting arab men!
HOW PATHETIC ARE THERE ARABS?
What ARAB LEADER is making them stop?
Is there on ARAB stateman telling these AFRO ARABS to stop killing AFRICANS in AFRICA?
Fck day mark, stop making excusses.
May 26th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
ITS THE ARABS in …
ITS THE ARABS in AFRICAN calling him self and AFRO ARAB!
WHAT THE DOES AFRO ARAB MEAN?
You are either african in blood or not!
The African has no explaining to do.
May 26th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
TODAY, its so …
TODAY, its so called AFRO ARABS killing africans in AFRICA!
GET the OUT OF Africa if you are not an african!
May 26th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
All man is related …
All man is related to african. but that doesnt mean he was smart enough to know when the days excisted that his racist books were created.
there is no point trying to defend muslims, christian or jew. The only thing i can respect about the christian is that he didnt start it and he admits to his doing.
But today, you have muslims that will tell you, they never inslaved africans, and they just walked into african a took contrill peacefully.
YEAH them and BUSH took controll preacefully!
May 26th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
“AFRICANS are not …
“AFRICANS are not ARABS, no matter how some of them look!”
In my opinion Arabs are related to their African neighbors.
May 26th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
This is very …
This is very important in understanding how conflicts can miss with peoples’ minds you can compare this to happenings in Rwanda. One thing you need to note is it is flawed logic to see “Arabs” in Sudan as an enemy because there is still good relations between people in Sudan its just some groups that are killing each other
See saying “Arabs” hate “Africans” is like saying African-Americans are drug dealers.
I’ll send you a link to an article “Sudanese: ‘What Arab-African rift?’”
May 26th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
Farrakhan and other …
Farrakhan and other muslims would like to tell people that it is a matter of blacks killing eachother in Sudan. ITS A LIE.
ARAB MUSLIMS are killing black african muslims, chritians and others. The AFRICAN says the ARABS are trying to exterminate the AFRICANS. The arab says he is not african and that he is an arab!
So why do you say, is it not a racist problem when it clearly is.
I am no sell out to Africans. FARRAKHAN and KHADAFI ARE!
May 26th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
Man you r blind …
Man you r blind brother.
There are ARABS IN SUDAN: They call themselves arabs from their own mouths.
AFRICANS are not ARABS, no matter how some of them look!
Not to forget to mention, there are AFRICAN women on the fron line fighting ARABS! ARABS are rapping AFRICAN WOMEN!
May 26th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
Yes I have, and it …
Yes I have, and it is obviously not created by black Africans. Why would Africans create an Anti African belief structure?
In fact the very people who created this Hametic belief are the very onces who were the Enemy of the Pharo and chased out of Kemet!
The Hyksos where not of African origin and it was not only the Hyksos who envaded. The Hyksos was just one tribe amoung other Euasian tribes who envaded Kemet!
It would not be the first time Dubuis was incorrect.
May 26th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
Have you heard of …
Have you heard of the Hamitic theory? Colonialists wanted people to believe that Africans were already being dominated by Asiatics
May 26th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
I’m not saying …
I’m not saying hatred doesn’t exist in those texts just that there is nothing anti-black colonialists wanted to say they were against black people though. In fact they speak very highly of Africans which is the opposite of what colonialists want people to think
There is no racist slavery in Sudan because everyone there is black just like in Rwanda
According to W.E.B. Dobuis the Hyksos “may have been Negroids from Asia”. Basically there was no such thing as white supremacy before modern times
May 26th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
My friend. If your …
My friend. If your not a Muslim then how are you so expert in knowing what an Muslim would do?
Second, you lack reading Muslim, Judaic and Chritian doctrin. Offcourse Beta Isreal is a completly different thing from Isrealites, Hyksos and other groups.
If you do not see the hatred today or connot read the hatred in the so called holy text, your the nut!
Its not me wanting racism to excist. What has been happening in that region of Africa for a long time has been racist, Arab or White!
May 26th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
How would Islam …
How would Islam create hatred against so called Africans if a so called Muslim hates Africans he’d hate them whither he was Muslim or not.
I’ve hared some people say Bilal wasn’t even a slave. Also Arabs in Sudan is like Tutsi in Rwanda, black skinned Caucasians? Do you believe in black skinned Caucasians
May 26th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
But people should …
But people should know what hatred for Africans lies in the Muslim religion and Arabs. Its nothing new.
Like I said, while Muslims like to talk about the white mans horrors. Muslims have been complicite with the White man! Expecially in regards to the ovverthrowing of Africa!
May 26th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
Once again. I could …
Once again. I could go on and on with this. But its not for me to change your mind. You never answered any of my pertinant questions any way.
You dismissed my question allways.
So did you find out what the difference between Tigrinia and Amharic are?
Not too mention, I openly am against all Abrahamic religions. They replace African history!
May 26th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
Actually, your not. …
Actually, your not.
Your actually claming that Islam, Christianity and Judaism did not play a mjor role in the decline of Africa.
My poster is current to the issue in Sudan. I am not saying the WHITE man is too blame for what is happening in Sudan.
In fact when I look at African history, I dont remove any group that has hade devistating effects. Muslims Arabs are indeed one group.
And in Sudan they are as well.
No mystery! It’s obvious.
May 26th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
Firstly, yes, it is …
Firstly, yes, it is the 21st Century. But to say that it doesn’t matter if one is Black, White, Arab, *Asian (all Asians aren’t Chinese) is completely erroneous. That is suggesting that someone’s race does not matter. If that were the case, there would not be half as many problems in this world regarding racism, terrorism, holy wars, race relations, cross-culturalism, and the like. I’m not saying that things like the cost of living are not an issue–I’m just saying that unfortunately,
May 26th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
I don’t understand …
I don’t understand why your background says “Stop Islamic slavery in Sudan” and “Get these religious racist out of Africa”
All I did was say someone was a Christian (not making a big deal out of it) but your here wanting to kick Muslims out of their native country?
May 26th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
Also watch my video …
Also watch my video:
Myth of Arab or Berber racism against “blacks” in the middle ages
May 26th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
It would be Western …
It would be Western colialism to create many of the problems we see
May 26th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
I’m not the one …
I’m not the one making a big deal out of these religions. These civilizatoins existed before these religions and even when these religons came these civilzations simply continued.
I’ve already shown this in many of my videos like the one on “introduction to the land of Zanj”
It would be Wes
May 26th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
You cannot deal …
You cannot deal with African people from a perspective of religion. That is a backwards concept. How you learn about different African people is by studying their tribe, and language.
See some peoples tribe and language excisted before JUDAISM, CHRITIANITYor ISLAM!
You come to find out it is pointless trying to know African through that lense. Those religions came late in history!
I think thats why we dont have the same views. I am not using Abrahamic religions as a platform!
May 26th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
My point in the …
My point in the post above was that even though those beliefs might be silliness they are not particularly “anti-African” they might even be “pro-African”
May 26th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
I havent seen it. …
I havent seen it. Havent had time to watch every video on youtube.
But I do know something you may want to take up. What id the difference between Tegrinia and Amharic? And here is another question, what language did the Ethipians speak? The ones you are speaking of?
What language is the Orthodox Ethipian bible written in? And what is the language connection to the Kemetic people?
May 26th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
What do you think …
What do you think about the video on youtube “Christian king of Ethiopia changes the course of history”